Compare/EV-SE vs Jellyfish

EV-SE vs Jellyfish

Jellyfish tracks what engineers are working on. EV-SE tells you whether that work is economically sustainable. Activity metrics ≠ economic sustainability.

DimensionEV-SEJellyfish
What it measuresEngineering sustainability over timeEngineering team activity metrics
OutputSustainability score, investment allocation analysisDashboards, reports, team comparisons
Question answered"Is your engineering investment sustainable?""What are engineers working on?"
AudienceCTOs, CFOs, board membersEngineering managers, VPs of Engineering
ApproachEconomic modeling of R&D capital allocationJira/GitHub data aggregation and visualization
CostFree (richardewing.io/tools/ev-se)$20K-$100K+/yr enterprise contracts
Board-ready?✅ Produces investment-grade analysis⚠️ Dashboards - requires interpretation

The Verdict

Use both - for different purposes. Jellyfish shows engineering activity. EV-SE evaluates whether that activity creates lasting value. Tracking without economic analysis is measurement without meaning.

Try the Free EV-SE Calculator →

Need an expert verdict?

30-minute rapid-fire evaluation. You describe the problem, I tell you which approach wins - and why.

Immediate Forensic Advisory Tiers

The Gut-Check Evaluation

$450

30-minute rapid triage for founders and executives who need to know if their architecture or cloud bill is on fire.

Book Gut-Check →

60-Min Insolvency Audit

$2,500

Dedicated teardown of your exact token leakage, retry settings, and technical debt bottlenecks with an immediate remediation plan.

Book Insolvency Audit →

Full R&D Capital Audit

$7,500

Complete forensic examination across team payroll, codebase health, and cloud spend. Delivers a 40-page board-ready audit.

View Audit Scope →

AI Cost Governance Retainer

$10,000/mo

Ongoing fractional executive oversight, vendor contract negotiations, and runtime guardrails to stop margin decay permanently.

Inquire for Retainer →

Richard Ewing: AI Economist & Capital Auditor